'When something dies, for me it's everywhere'

 

installation (photography, video)

2015

 

Who has the right for rperesentation (of culture and history)? Can the abundance of objects compensate the lack? Part of which imaginary communities and spaces am i? How significant is my absence and presence?

Idea of emptyness (of space for statement and action) in Belarusian cultural and political reality often revolves around the belief in state's monopoly for representation. Which on one hand operates through prohibition of  alternative statements, and on the other  — through co-optation of the alternative discources (of contemporary art, avant-gurade, street art, etc.) However within the mythology of emptyness the attmept to represent oneslef (as part of a community) through lack and negation holds the danger of self-exoticism and self-colonisation, as well as assumption of the ideal distant space, where meanings and things are present.

Marble, which remained from the Soviet time as  of spacial heritage, is a symbol of the official Belarusian power and culture, of its siblime, abundance; and spectacularity. The material itslef seems to stress important features of the self-representation of the contemporary Belarusian power, such as decorativity, disfunctionality, appearance (of the Soviet, of absolute or classical power). The Space of Victoria and Albert museum in London, where i have been living for the past year, incorporates countless heritage of the colonial power, the abundance of objects brought from the fetishized cultures of the past.

The photographs work with the notions of lack, absence, prohibition, obstacles; self-exoticism and self-colonisation; a dream about ideal faraway space. They deal with the dialectics of visible and invisible, of empty signifiers of past and present; persuation in impossibility of action, demonstrative control, closure; boredom and spectacularity, (dis)function of vision.